Search for: All records

Assistive robot arms can help humans by partially automating their desired tasks. Consider an adult with motor impairments controlling an assistive robot arm to eat dinner. The robot can reduce the number of human inputs — and how precise those inputs need to be — by recognizing what the human wants (e.g., a fork) and assisting for that task (e.g., moving towards the fork). Prior research has largely focused on learning the human’s task and providing meaningful assistance. But as the robot learns and assists, we also need to ensure that the human understands the robot’s intent (e.g., does the human know the robot is reaching for a fork?). In this paper, we study the effects of communicating learned assistance from the robot back to the human operator. We do not focus on the specific interfaces used for communication. Instead, we develop experimental and theoretical models of a) how communication changes the way humans interact with assistive robot arms, and b) how robots can harness these changes to better align with the human’s intent. We first conduct online and in-person user studies where participants operate robots that provide partial assistance, and we measure how the human’s inputs change with and without communication. With communication, we find that humans are more likely to intervene when the robot incorrectly predicts their intent, and more likely to release control when the robot correctly understands their task. We then use these findings to modify an established robot learning algorithm so that the robot can correctly interpret the human’s inputs when communication is present. Our results from a second in-person user study suggest that this combination of communication and learning outperforms assistive systems that isolate either learning or communication. See videos here: https://youtu.be/BET9yuVTVU4 

Robots can use auditory, visual, or haptic interfaces to convey information to human users. The way these interfaces select signals is typically pre-defined by the designer: for instance, a haptic wristband might vibrate when the robot is moving and squeeze when the robot stops. But different people interpret the same signals in different ways, so that what makes sense to one person might be confusing or unintuitive to another. In this paper we introduce a unified algorithmic formalism for learningco-adaptiveinterfaces fromscratch. Our method does not need to know the human’s task (i.e., what the human is using these signals for). Instead, our insight is that interpretable interfaces should select signals that maximizecorrelationbetween the human’s actions and the information the interface is trying to convey. Applying this insight we develop LIMIT: Learning Interfaces to Maximize Information Transfer. LIMIT optimizes a tractable, real-time proxy of information gain in continuous spaces. The first time a person works with our system the signals may appear random; but over repeated interactions the interface learns a one-to-one mapping between displayed signals and human responses. Our resulting approach is both personalized to the current user and not tied to any specific interface modality. We compare LIMIT to state-of-the-art baselines across controlled simulations, an online survey, and an in-person user study with auditory, visual, and haptic interfaces. Overall, our results suggest that LIMIT learns interfaces that enable users to complete the task more quickly and efficiently, and users subjectively prefer LIMIT to the alternatives. See videos here:https://youtu.be/IvQ3TM1_2fA.